Chelsea abuse high court case as Two ex-players claimed club racially mishandled them
Two previous Chelsea youth-cooperative individuals have told the BBC they are "as yet battling for equity and equity" in the wake of claiming they were racially mishandled at the club during the 1990s.
They are among four players who are taking the club to the High Court to look for harms, guaranteeing their vocations and lives were demolished.
Chelsea apologized a year ago after a Barnardo's audit said the maltreatment was "prompted" by previous mentor and foundation executive Gwyn Williams.
Williams, who left the club in 2006, denies "any charges" and says he "didn't act in a supremacist route towards an adolescent or other player" at Chelsea.
In a meeting with BBC Sport, where the two players detail the maltreatment they state they endured and how it has influenced them, one player said Chelsea's way to deal with their case had been "totally disturbing".
The players additionally blamed the club for "lip service" when Chelsea was supporting the Black Lives Matter development.
What's more, they state how they have been harmed by insults via web-based networking media that their case has been roused by cash.
One player, who said he was called disdainful racial names, endured racial generalizations and was tormented by Williams into demonstrating others his penis, guaranteed the maltreatment had prompted "relationship issues, melancholy and demolished as long as I can remember".
He included: "It's completely appalling. Chelsea has gotten an opportunity to correct things and I feel they haven't done that by any stretch of the imagination. We haven't had a [personal] statement of regret.
"So nothing has changed from 25 or 30 years prior when we were there. We are as yet hearing very similar things; we are as yet battling for equity and correspondence."
They are among four players who are taking the club to the High Court to look for harms, guaranteeing their vocations and lives were demolished.
Chelsea apologized a year ago after a Barnardo's audit said the maltreatment was "prompted" by previous mentor and foundation executive Gwyn Williams.
Williams, who left the club in 2006, denies "any charges" and says he "didn't act in a supremacist route towards an adolescent or other player" at Chelsea.
In a meeting with BBC Sport, where the two players detail the maltreatment they state they endured and how it has influenced them, one player said Chelsea's way to deal with their case had been "totally disturbing".
The players additionally blamed the club for "lip service" when Chelsea was supporting the Black Lives Matter development.
What's more, they state how they have been harmed by insults via web-based networking media that their case has been roused by cash.
One player, who said he was called disdainful racial names, endured racial generalizations and was tormented by Williams into demonstrating others his penis, guaranteed the maltreatment had prompted "relationship issues, melancholy and demolished as long as I can remember".
He included: "It's completely appalling. Chelsea has gotten an opportunity to correct things and I feel they haven't done that by any stretch of the imagination. We haven't had a [personal] statement of regret.
"So nothing has changed from 25 or 30 years prior when we were there. We are as yet hearing very similar things; we are as yet battling for equity and correspondence."
Post a Comment